Inpatient opioid use and pain control after robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, the proportion of bariatric surgery performed robotically has been rising. However, the clinical benefits of the robotic approach over laparoscopy are uncertain. One area in need of further investigation is pain control after robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of bariatric surgery patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution from October 2019 to August 2022. Inpatient opioid use was measured in morphine milliequivalents. Pain scores were collected by the nursing staff. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were included: 286 laparoscopic and 82 robotic surgery patients. The groups shared similar demographics. For the entire cohort, the mean age was 42 years, the body mass index was 50 kg/m2, and 79% were female. Mean operative time was significantly lower for laparoscopic surgeries (87.5 ± 47.3 minutes vs 109.3 ± 30.3 minutes; P < .01). The median total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents used was similar for both groups: 52.3 (31.5-77.0) for the laparoscopic group versus 40 (24-74.5) for robotic (P = .13). Mean postoperative pain scores (scale out of 10) were not significantly different between groups: 5.2 ± 1.7 (postoperative day 0) and 4.5 ± 1.7 (day 1) for laparoscopic patients versus 5.1 ± 2.0 (day 0) and 4.4 ± 1.8 (day 1) for robotic. The proportion of patients prescribed opioids at discharge was significantly higher for the laparoscopic group (75.2% vs 62.2%; P = .02). Other clinical outcomes, including duration of stay, 30-day readmissions, and visits to the emergency department, were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in inpatient opioid use or pain scores between patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic sleeve gastrectomy.

Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is routinely performed using laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent among both robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgeons. Studies evaluating ergonomic differences between laparoscopic and robotic bariatric surgery are limited. This study aims to analyze the ergonomic, physical, and mental workload differences among surgeons performing robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All primary laparoscopic and robotic bariatric surgeries, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy between May and August 2022 were included in this study. Objective ergonomic analysis was performed by an observer evaluating each surgeon intraoperatively according to the validated Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool, with a higher score indicating more ergonomic strain. After each operation, surgeons subjectively evaluated their physical workload using the body part discomfort scale, and their mental workload using the surgery task load index. RESULTS: Five bariatric surgeons participated in this study. In total, 50 operative cases were observed, 37 laparoscopic and 13 robotic. The median total Rapid Entire Body Assessmentscore as a primary surgeon was significantly higher in laparoscopic (6.0) compared to robotic (3.0) cases (P < 0.01). The laparoscopic and robotic approaches had no significant differences in the surgeons' physical (body part discomfort scale) or mental workload (surgery task load index). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified low-risk ergonomic stress in surgeons performing bariatric surgery robotically compared to medium-risk stress laparoscopically. Since ergonomic stress can exist even without the perception of physical or mental stress, this highlights the importance of external observations to optimize ergonomics for surgeons in the operating room.

The Association of Preoperative Food Insecurity With Early Postoperative Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the rate of food insecurity in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. To compare the rates of 30-d postoperative complications based on food security status. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 7/2020 - 3/2022 were screened for food insecurity via telephone using questions from the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool. Screens were matched to patient data and 30-d outcomes from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. RESULTS: In total, 213 (59%) of the 359 bariatric surgery patients were screened with 81 (38%) screening positive for food insecurity. Evaluation of preoperative variables based on food security status showed comparable age, body mass index, and comorbidity status. Food insecure patients were found to have an increased length of stay following surgery compared to food secure patients (P = 0.003). Food insecurity was not associated with higher rates of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program reported 30-d postoperative complications including emergency department/urgent care visits (P = 0.34) and hospital readmissions (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity was prevalent at 38% of the bariatric surgical population. Food insecure patients had a statistically longer length of stay after primary bariatric surgery but were not associated with an increased risk of 30-d complications. Future studies are needed to determine the mid-term and long-term effects of food insecurity status on bariatric surgical outcomes and the potential impact of food insecurity on length of stay.

Implementation of a standardized multimodal pain regimen significantly reduces postoperative inpatient opioid utilization in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Routine opioid use in surgical patients has received attention given the opioid epidemic and a renewed focus on the dangers and drawbacks of opioids in the postoperative setting. Little is known about opioid use in bariatric surgery, especially in the inpatient setting. We hypothesize that a standardized opioid-sparing protocol reduces postoperative inpatient opioid use in bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of bariatric surgery patients at a single institution. From March to September 2019, a standardized intraoperative and postoperative opioid-sparing protocol was designed and implemented along with an educational program for patients regarding safe pain management. Inpatient opioid utilization in patients undergoing surgery in the preintervention phase between April and March 2019 was compared to patients from a postintervention phase of October 2019 to December 2020. Opioid utilization was measured in morphine milliequivalents (MME). RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included; 192 preintervention and 167 postintervention. Patients were similar demographically. For all patients, mean age was 44.1 years, mean BMI 49.2 kg/m2, and 80% were female. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was performed in 48%, laparoscopic gastric bypass in 34%, robotic sleeve gastrectomy in 17%, and robotic gastric bypass in 1%. In the postintervention phase inpatient opioid utilization was significantly lower [median 134.8 [79.0-240.8] MME preintervention vs. 61.5 [35.5-150.0] MME postintervention (p < 0.001)]. MME prescribed at discharge decreased from a median of 300 MME preintervention to 75 MME postintervention (p < 0.001). In the postintervention phase, 16% of patients did not receive an opioid prescription at discharge compared to 0% preintervention (p < 0.001). When examining by procedure, statistically significant reductions in opioid utilization were seen for each operation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized intraoperative and postoperative multimodal pain regimen and educational program significantly reduces inpatient opioid utilization in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Transversus abdominis plane blocks for complex abdominal wall reconstruction decrease hospital length of stay compared to epidurals.

BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral and incisional hernias can be quite painful with prolonged length of stay (LOS). There are a variety of options to manage post-operative pain after a ventral hernia repair, including epidural catheters, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, and intravenous narcotic pain medications (IVPM). We hypothesized that TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine decrease the LOS compared to epidurals and IVPM. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an open ventral hernia repair with retromuscular mesh between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. LOS was used as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included post-operative pain and 90-day post-operative complications. RESULTS: An epidural was used in 66 patients, a TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine in 18 patients, and IVPM in 11 patients. The epidural group was noted to have a significantly longer duration of surgery (251.11 vs. 207.94 min; P < 0.05) and larger area of mesh (461.85 vs. 338.17 cm2; P < 0.05) when compared to the TAP block group. Hospital LOS was significantly shorter for the TAP block group compared to the epidural group (4.22 vs. 5.62 days; P < 0.05). There were no differences in post-operative complications between the groups. The epidural group reported significantly lower post-operative day one (POD1) pain scores measured on a 10-point scale, compared to the IVPM and TAP block groups (5.00 vs. 6.91 vs. 7.50; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who received a TAP block for post-operative pain management had a significantly shorter length of stay compared to those patients who received an epidural. While the TAP block group reported higher POD1 pain scores, they did not have a significant difference in post-operative complications. TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine should be considered for post-operative pain control in complex ventral hernia repairs.

Examining current patterns of opioid prescribing and use after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate amount of opioid medications to prescribe following bariatric surgery are lacking. We sought to determine our current opioid-prescribing practices, patient utilization, and satisfaction with pain control following elective bariatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review and phone survey were conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from April 2018 to March 2019 at a single academic medical center. Opioid medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents provided (MMEs). RESULTS: In total, 192 patients met inclusion criteria. The median amount of opioid medication prescribed on discharge was 300 oral MMEs, although there was a significant difference between the MMEs prescribed to patients with and without chronic opioid therapy (median 300 MMEs opioid naïve vs. 375 MMEs chronic opioid therapy, p = 0.01). Significantly fewer SG patients required a refill of their opioid medication compared to RYGB (8.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.003). Of the 192 patients, 87 (45.3%) completed the phone survey. Fifty-six patients (64%) reported that they took half or less of the initially prescribed opioids. Of the patients with leftover medication, 36% reported that they did not dispose of the medication. Overall understanding of pain control options after surgery was significantly lower in patients who felt they were prescribed "too little" opioids (p = 0.01), patients requiring refills (p = 0.02), and patients who were not satisfied with their pain control (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: There is a gap between the amount of opioid medication prescribed and taken by patients following bariatric surgery in our practice. Patients who were least satisfied with their pain control reported knowledge gaps about pain control options that were more significant than patients who were more satisfied. Future initiatives should focus on the reduction of opioids prescribed to bariatric surgery patients post-operatively and on opioid education for patients.

The influence of preoperative carbohydrate loading on postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative carbohydrate loading is a component of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, but there is limited literature in bariatric surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to characterize the impact of preoperative carbohydrate loading on postoperative bariatric surgery outcomes. SETTING: University Hospital. METHODS: Patients undergoing a primary minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between 2018 and 2020 were randomized to standard management or intervention. Standard management patients were nothing by mouth (NPO) after midnight prior to surgery. Intervention patients consumed 2 carbohydrate drinks: 1 the night before and another 3 hours prior to surgery. Primary outcomes analyzed included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay, and overall complications. RESULTS: In total, 134 patients were analyzed: 64 intervention (47.8%) and 70 (52.2%) standard. In the end, 7% and 15% of patients were lost to follow-up at 6-weeks and 3-months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in length of stay (2.0 ± 1.2 vs 2.1 ± .9 d; P = .65) or postoperative outcomes between the 2 groups. There were no episodes of aspiration among the intervention group. Among RYGB patients, intervention patients had a shorter duration of nausea compared with standard patients. There was no significant difference in glycemic control among patients with and without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative carbohydrate drinks can be administered to bariatric surgery patients without significant risks. Carbohydrate loading preoperatively can decrease the duration of PONV in RYGB patients. Carbohydrate drinks can be safely included in bariatric ERAS protocols for patients with and without diabetes, although the benefits remain unknown.

SAGES primer for taking care of yourself during and after the COVID-19 crisis.

COVID-19 is a pandemic which has affected almost every aspect of our life since starting globally in November 2019. Given the rapidity of spread and inadequate time to prepare for record numbers of sick patients, our surgical community faces an unforeseen challenge. SAGES is committed to the protection and care of patients, their surgeons and staff, and all who are served by the medical community at large. This includes physical health, mental health, and well-being of all involved. The fear of the unknown ahead can be paralyzing. International news media have chronicled the unthinkable situations that physicians and other health care providers have been thrust into as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These situations include making life or death decisions for patients and their families regarding use of limited health care resources. It includes caring for patients with quickly deteriorating conditions and limited treatments available. Until recently, these situations seemed far from home, and now they are in our own hospitals. As the pandemic broadened its reach, the reality that we as surgeons may be joining the front line is real. It may be happening to you now; it may be on the horizon in the coming weeks. In this context, SAGES put together this document addressing concerns on clinician stressors in these times of uncertainty. We chose to focus on the emotional toll of the situation on the clinician, protecting vulnerable persons, reckoning with social isolation, and promoting wellness during this crisis. At the same time, the last part of this document deals with the "light at the end of the tunnel," discussing potential opportunities, lessons learned, and the positives that can come out of this crisis.

Primary care providers' attitudes and knowledge of bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing obesity prevalence among American adults, relatively few qualified patients proceed to bariatric surgery. Suggested explanations include referral barriers for weight loss management at primary care provider (PCP) visits. This study aims to assess the referral and practice patterns of PCPs treating patients with obesity. Our goal is to understand treatment barriers in order to implement targeted interventions that enhance quality of care. METHODS: A 39-question electronic survey was emailed to PCPs at a single academic institution with community physicians. Questions explored providers' demographics, referral patterns, and knowledge of pathophysiologic obesity mechanisms and bariatric surgery qualifications. Frequency and univariate analyses were performed and compared providers' demographics, positions, and BMIs between referring providers and non-referring providers. RESULTS: Of 121 surveys distributed, we achieved a 33.9% response rate (n = 41). 78.0% stated that > 15% of their patients in the preceding year were classified as obese. PCPs indicated initiating weight loss management conversations < 50% of the time with 48.8% of patients. Provider-identified barriers to discussing weight loss surgery included being unsure if patient's insurance would cover the procedure or if patients would qualify (24.4% vs. 19.5%). In addition, 43.9% of providers felt that the risks of bariatric surgery outweigh the benefits. CONCLUSION: Despite a large percentage of patients cared for by PCPs being classified as obese, few providers initiate discussions on weight loss options with potentially eligible surgical candidates. The barriers identified indicate an opportunity for improved education on patient qualifications, strategies for streamlining conversations and referrals, and reinforcement of the safety of surgical weight loss. Providers' desire for this education demonstrates an opportunity to work toward minimizing the referral gap by increasing patient conversations about these topics.

The Risk of Post-operative Complications in Super-Super Obesity Compared to Super Obesity in Accredited Bariatric Surgery Centers.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of super obesity (SO, BMI > 50.0 kg/m2) and super-super obesity (SSO, BMI > 60 kg/m2) is increasing. Current data are limited and discrepant on the relationship between SSO and post-bariatric surgery complication risk. We hypothesized there would be increased complications for both laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in SSO compared to SO, but the relative risk (RR) would support the use of LSG in SSO patients. METHODS: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement 2016 data were queried for SO and SSO patients undergoing LRYGB or LSG. Thirty-day post-operative complications were calculated. Univariate analyses were performed with a χ2 or Student's t test. Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 5723 patients with SSO and 24,940 with SO were included for analysis. Patients with SSO had more co-morbidities. Patients with SSO had a higher likelihood of complications compared to SO patients (15.2% vs 12.6%, p < 0.0005). SSO patients, and specifically SSO RYGB, were significantly more likely to experience an unplanned intubation, prolonged ventilation, and unplanned ICU admission. Compared to SO LRYGB, the RR for complications in SSO LRYGB and LGS were 1.19 and 0.76 respectively (p < 0.0005). DISCUSSION: We found SSO patients had increased 30-day post-operative complications after both LRYGB and LSG compared to SO patients. LSG may be the preferred procedure for this high-risk population.

Buyer's remorse: what predicts post-decision dissonance after bariatric surgery?

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery continues to be the most effective long-term treatment for obesity and its associated co-morbidities. Despite the benefits, not all patients may repeat the decision to undergo bariatric surgery based on their postoperative experience (postdecision dissonance). OBJECTIVES: In this study, we explore the predictors of postdecision dissonance following bariatric surgery. SETTING: Accredited bariatric center at an academic medical center. METHODS: Patients at an accredited Bariatric Center who underwent bariatric surgery between 2011 and 2017 were surveyed to determine factors predictive of postdecision dissonance, as well as expectations, well-being, and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 591 patients were sent surveys, of whom 184 (31.1%) responded. Of the 184 responders, 20 (10.9%) patients would not choose to undergo bariatric surgery if they had it do to over again (postdecision dissonance). There was no difference in the time since surgery, age, sex, or type of bariatric surgery among groups. Dissonant patients were less likely to be married and privately insured. Dissonant patients were more likely to feel they had inadequate preoperative education on postoperative expectations (P < .001). These patients also had significantly greater postoperative weight regain, failed weight loss expectations, depression, and dissatisfied body image. CONCLUSION: Postdecision dissonance is driven in part by a patient's perceived inadequacy of preoperative preparation for postoperative outcomes coupled with postoperative weight regain, depression, dissatisfied body image, and failed weight loss expectations. This highlights the importance of preoperative counseling on managing expectations and outcomes after surgery, as well as the need for continued postoperative engagement with a bariatric program to address weight regain and provide mental health support.

Preoperative functional health status is a predictor of short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Functional health status (FHS) is the ability to perform activities of daily living without caregiver assistance. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact of impaired preoperative FHS on morbidity and mortality within 30 days of bariatric surgery. SETTING: Academic medical center in the United States. METHODS: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2015 data set was queried for primary minimally invasive bariatric procedures. The demographic characteristics and perioperative details of patients who were functionally independent were compared with patients with impaired FHS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the odds of developing a perioperative complication or death for patients with impaired functional health. RESULTS: Of patients, 1515 (1.0%) were reported as having impaired FHS and 147,195 patients (99.0%) were independent before surgery. Patients with impaired FHS experienced significantly longer length of hospital stays (2.4 versus 1.8 d; P < .0001), a higher morbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.5; P <0.0001), and higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.1; P < .0001). Impaired FHS resulted in significantly increased rate of unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit, interventions, reoperations, and readmissions within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with impaired FHS preoperatively have a significantly increased risk of short-term morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. The results of this study highlight the importance of establishing quality initiatives focused on improving short-term outcomes for patients with impaired functional health status.

Linear vs. circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques exist to create the gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Linear-stapled anastomosis (LSA) and circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) are two commonly employed techniques. We hypothesized that CSA is associated with an increased rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and gastrojejunostomy stenosis when compared to LSA. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent LRYGB for morbid obesity at a single institution between 2012 and 2016. Three bariatric surgeons contributed patients to this series. Clinical information and perioperative outcomes were collected through 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: 171 patients met the inclusion criteria. Two patients did not complete 90-day follow-up and were excluded from the analysis (88 patients CSA, 81 LSA; 99% 90-day follow-up). Patient demographics did not differ between groups. The LSA technique was associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (0 (0%) vs. 6 (6.8%), p = 0.02) and stenosis (2 (2.5%) vs. 17 (19.3%), p < 0.01). The CSA technique demonstrated a greater number of endoscopic dilations per stenotic event (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.0 ± 0, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In our experience, a gastrojejunostomy constructed with an LSA technique was associated with a significantly reduced rate of stenosis and SSI compared to the CSA technique. LSA is currently our anastomotic technique of choice in LRYGB.

Metabolic Syndrome Is a Significant Predictor of Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Following Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Metabolic syndrome is commonly demonstrated in patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of metabolic syndrome on morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset was queried for patients who underwent bariatric surgical procedures between 2012 and 2014. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, bariatric procedure type, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Metabolic syndrome was defined as having a body mass index > 30 kg/m2 in the presence of the comorbid conditions of hypertension and diabetes. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between metabolic syndrome and postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: During the study interval, 59,404 patients underwent bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass = 28,263, sleeve gastrectomy = 30,239, revision = 422, and biliopancreatic diversion = 480). The mean body mass index was 45.9 kg/m2, and the mean age was 45 years. Of the cohort, 30,104 (50.6%) patients had a diagnosis of hypertension, 16,558 (27.8%) had diabetes mellitus, and 12,803 (21.5%) met the criteria for metabolic syndrome. Patients with metabolic syndrome were more likely to have Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure, a history of congestive heart failure, severe COPD, renal failure, and diminished functional status (p < 0.0001). Morbidity was greater for patients with metabolic syndrome (7.5% vs. 5%; p < 0.0001), and patients in this subset also had a 3.2-fold increased risk of mortality (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Metabolic syndrome is prevalent in patients who undergo bariatric surgery. We have demonstrated that patients with the constellation of comorbid conditions defining metabolic syndrome are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery. Patients and surgeons should be informed of the potential increased risk in this patient population.

Mesh Selection in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Selection of mesh for ventral hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction can be challenging. Since the adoption of a tension-free mesh repair, the recurrence rates and outcomes after ventral hernia repair have substantially improved. The market for medical prostheses is constantly changing, with new technology in development attempting to create the ideal mesh for each clinical scenario. Permanent mesh is typically used for clean wounds. The various mesh materials, density, and pore sizes are discussed. In addition, the materials commonly used for contaminated wounds (absorbable synthetic and biologic meshes) are described. The latest literature regarding the use of various mesh materials is reviewed and organized to help make an informed decision regarding the appropriate use of reinforcing material.

The impact of preoperative anemia and malnutrition on outcomes in paraesophageal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a paraesophageal hernia may experience gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and/or obstructive symptoms such as dysphagia. Some patients with large and complex paraesophageal hernias unintentionally lose a significant amount of weight secondary to difficulty eating. A subset of patients will develop Cameron's erosions in the hernia, which contribute to anemia. Given the heterogeneous nature of patients who ultimately undergo paraesophageal hernia repair, we sought to determine if patients with anemia or malnutrition suffered from increased morbidity or mortality. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2011 to 2015 were queried to identify patients undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair. Malnutrition was defined as preoperative albumin < 3.5 g/dL. Preoperative anemia was defined as hematocrit less than 36% for females and 39% for males. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 15,105 patients underwent paraesophageal hernia repair in the study interval. Of these patients, 7943 (52.6%) had a recorded preoperative albumin and 13.9% of these patients were malnourished. There were 13,139 (87%) patients with a documented preoperative hematocrit and 23.1% met criteria for anemia. Both anemia and malnutrition were associated with higher rates of complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality. This was confirmed on logistic regression. The average postoperative length of stay was longer in the malnourished (6.1 vs. 3.1 days when not malnourished, p < 0.0001) and anemic (4.1 vs. 2.8 days without anemia, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Malnutrition and anemia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair, as well as a longer length of stay. This information can be used for risk assessment and perhaps preoperative optimization of these risk factors when clinically appropriate.

Perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion are major risk factors for venous thromboembolism following bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after bariatric surgery. Perioperative chemoprophylaxis is used routinely with bariatric surgery to decrease the risk of VTE. When bleeding occurs, routine chemoprophylaxis is often withheld due to concerns about inciting another bleeding event. We sought to evaluate the relationship between perioperative bleeding and postoperative VTE in bariatric surgery. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset between 2012 and 2014 was queried to identify patients who underwent bariatric surgery. Gastric bypass (n = 28,145), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 30,080), bariatric revision (n = 324), and biliopancreatic diversion procedures (n = 492) were included. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to determine perioperative factors predictive of postoperative VTE within 30 days in patients who experience a bleeding complication necessitating transfusion. RESULTS: The rate of bleeding necessitating transfusion was 1.3%. Bleeding was significantly more likely to occur in gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy (1.6 vs. 1.0%) (p < 0.0001). For all surgeries, increased age, length of stay, operative time, and comorbidities including hypertension, dyspnea with moderate exertion, partially dependent functional status, bleeding disorder, transfusion prior to surgery, ASA class III/IV, and metabolic syndrome increased the perioperative bleeding risk (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the rate of VTE was significantly higher after blood transfusion [Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.7; 95% CI 2.9-7.9; p < 0.0001). Predictive risk factors for VTE after transfusion included previous bleeding disorder, ASA class III or IV, and COPD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery patients who receive postoperative blood transfusion are at a significantly increased risk for VTE. The etiology of VTE in those who are transfused is likely multifactorial and possibly related to withholding chemoprophylaxis and the potential of a hypercoagulable state induced by the transfusion. In those who bleed, consideration should be given to reinitiating chemoprophylaxis when safe, extending treatment after discharge, and screening ultrasound.